articleHealth Science ReportsJun 1, 2024GOLD OA

The Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool 2 (RoB 2) versus the original RoB: A perspective on the pros and cons

Kerman University of Medical Sciences · Universal Scientific Education and Research Network · +3 more institutions

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefdoajpubmed

Abstract

Methods

Statistical analysis and methodology is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analyzed in this study.

Results

The overall approach in RoB 2 is that by answering some signaling questions after the specification of results, effects of interest, and sources of information, an overall judgment for the quality of each study is reached. Accordingly, in the original version of the Cochrane RoB tool, the judgment can be in three different conclusions, including low, unclear, and high risk of bias. The most prominent difference in bias domains is the removal of "other bias" domain being replaced by "overall bias" judgment. Also, the most common presentation types of Cochrane risk of bias assessments are the "summary" and "graph" which are generated by Review Manager, web-based applications, or packages in R software.

No related works found for this paper.