The Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool 2 (RoB 2) versus the original RoB: A perspective on the pros and cons
Kerman University of Medical Sciences · Universal Scientific Education and Research Network · +3 more institutions
Abstract
Statistical analysis and methodology is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analyzed in this study.
The overall approach in RoB 2 is that by answering some signaling questions after the specification of results, effects of interest, and sources of information, an overall judgment for the quality of each study is reached. Accordingly, in the original version of the Cochrane RoB tool, the judgment can be in three different conclusions, including low, unclear, and high risk of bias. The most prominent difference in bias domains is the removal of "other bias" domain being replaced by "overall bias" judgment. Also, the most common presentation types of Cochrane risk of bias assessments are the "summary" and "graph" which are generated by Review Manager, web-based applications, or packages in R software.
Citation impact
- FWCI
- 66.86
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 18
Authors
3- SASeyed Aria Nejadghaderi
Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Universal Scientific Education and Research Network
- MBMaryam Balibegloo
Universal Scientific Education and Research Network, Research Network (United States)
- NRNima RezaeiCorresponding
Universal Scientific Education and Research Network, Children's Medical Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences
Topics & keywords
- Publication bias
- Systematic review
- Cochrane collaboration
- Randomized controlled trial
- Meta-analysis
- Computer science
- Medicine
- MEDLINE