reviewJAMAJun 12, 2024GREEN OA

Prolonged vs Intermittent Infusions of β-Lactam Antibiotics in Adults With Sepsis or Septic Shock

The University of Queensland · Royal North Shore Hospital · +25 more institutions

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Importance

There is uncertainty about whether prolonged infusions of β-lactam antibiotics improve clinically important outcomes in critically ill adults with sepsis or septic shock.

Objective

To determine whether prolonged β-lactam antibiotic infusions are associated with a reduced risk of death in critically ill adults with sepsis or septic shock compared with intermittent infusions. Data Sources: The primary search was conducted with MEDLINE (via PubMed), CINAHL, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and ClinicalTrials.gov from inception to May 2, 2024. Study Selection: Randomized clinical trials comparing prolonged (continuous or extended) and intermittent infusions of β-lactam antibiotics in critically ill adults with sepsis or septic shock. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Data extraction and risk of bias were assessed independently by 2 reviewers. Certainty of evidence was evaluated with the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. A bayesian framework was used as the primary analysis approach and a frequentist framework as the secondary approach. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was all-cause 90-day mortality. Secondary outcomes included intensive care unit (ICU) mortality and clinical cure.

Citation impact

138
total citations
FWCI
55.84
Percentile
100%
References
48
Citations per year

Authors

25

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Medicine
  • Septic shock
  • Sepsis
  • Intensive care medicine
  • Randomized controlled trial
  • Intensive care unit
  • Relative risk
  • Internal medicine
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Good health and well-being
No related works found for this paper.