Evaluating Retrieval Quality in Retrieval-Augmented Generation
University of Massachusetts Amherst
Abstract
Evaluating retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) presents challenges, particularly for retrieval models within these systems. Traditional end-to-end evaluation methods are computationally expensive. Furthermore, evaluation of the retrieval model's performance based on query-document relevance labels shows a small correlation with the RAG system's downstream performance. We propose a novel evaluation approach, eRAG, where each document in the retrieval list is individually utilized by the large language model within the RAG system. The output generated for each document is then evaluated based on the downstream task ground truth labels. In this manner, the downstream performance for each document serves as its…
Citation impact
- FWCI
- 83.70
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 15
Authors
2Topics & keywords
- Computer science
- Quality (philosophy)
- Information retrieval
- Artificial intelligence