COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures version 2.0
Amsterdam Neuroscience · Public Health Service of Amsterdam · +3 more institutions
Abstract
Adaptations to the methodology were based on our experience with applying the COSMIN guideline, through discussions among the authors, and results from two related Delphi studies.
The updated guideline places more emphasis on key aspects that are often missing or sub optimally conducted in published systematic reviews of PROMs, such as formulating a well-defined research question and developing a comprehensive search strategy, assessing risk of bias, applying criteria for good measurement properties, summarizing results, and grading the quality of the evidence. We also stress the importance of evaluating the measurement properties of each subscale of a PROM separately and evaluating content validity of all included PROMs.
Citation impact
- FWCI
- 100.59
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 26
Authors
3- LBLidwine B. MokkinkCorresponding
Amsterdam Neuroscience, Public Health Service of Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam
- EBEllen B. M. Elsman
Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
- CBCaroline B. Terwee
Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Topics & keywords
- Guideline
- Quality of Life Research
- Patient-reported outcome
- Public health
- Outcome (game theory)
- Medicine
- Psychology
- Physical therapy