Third-party evaluators perceive AI as more compassionate than expert humans
University of Toronto · St. Michael's Hospital
Abstract
Empathy connects us but strains under demanding settings. This study explored how third parties evaluated AI-generated empathetic responses versus human responses in terms of compassion, responsiveness, and overall preference across four preregistered experiments. Participants (N = 556) read empathy prompts describing valenced personal experiences and compared the AI responses to select non-expert or expert humans. Results revealed that AI responses were preferred and rated as more compassionate compared to select human responders (Study 1). This pattern of results remained when author identity was made transparent (Study 2), when AI was compared to expert crisis responders (Study 3), and when author identity…
Citation impact
- FWCI
- 92.34
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 47
Authors
3Topics & keywords
- Empathy
- Compassion
- Psychology
- Social psychology
- Preference
- Identity (music)
- Cognitive psychology