Update to the PRISMA guidelines for network meta-analyses and scoping reviews and development of guidelines for rapid reviews: a scoping review protocol
St. Michael's Hospital · University of Toronto · +42 more institutions
Abstract
The objective of this scoping review is to develop a list of items for potential inclusion in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) reporting guidelines for network meta-analysis (NMA), scoping reviews (ScRs), and rapid reviews (RRs).
The PRISMA extensions for NMA and ScRs were published in 2015 and 2018. However, since then, their methodologies and innovations, including automation, have evolved. There is no reporting guideline for RRs. In 2020, an updated PRISMA statement was published, reflecting advances in the conduct and reporting of systematic reviews. These advances are not yet incorporated into these PRISMA extensions. We will update our previous methods for scoping reviews to inform the update of PRISMA-NMA and PRISMA-ScR as well as the development of the PRISMA-RR reporting guidelines. INCLUSION CRITERIA: This review will include any study design evaluating the completeness of reporting, offering reporting guidance, or assessing methods relevant to NMA, ScRs, or RRs. Editorial guidelines and tutorials that describe items related to reporting completeness will also be eligible.
Citation impact
- FWCI
- 64.61
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 62
Authors
43- AAAreti Angeliki VeronikiCorresponding
St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto
- BHBrian Hutton
University of Ottawa, Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa Public Health, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
- ASAdrienne Stevens
Public Health Agency of Canada
- JEJoanne E. McKenzie
Monash University
- MJMatthew J. Page
Monash University
Topics & keywords
- Protocol (science)
- Systematic review
- Meta-analysis
- Computer science
- Data science
- MEDLINE
- Medicine
- Political science