The present and future of peer review: Ideas, interventions, and evidence
Eötvös Loránd University · Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Psychology · +14 more institutions
Abstract
What is wrong with the peer review system? Is peer review sustainable? Useful? What other models exist? These are central yet contentious questions in today's academic discourse. This perspective critically discusses alternative models and revisions to the peer review system. The authors highlight possible changes to the peer review system, with the goal of fostering further dialog among the main stakeholders, including producers and consumers of scientific research. Neither our list of identified issues with the peer review system nor our discussed resolutions are complete. A point of agreement is that fair assessment and efficient change would require more comprehensive and rigorous data on the various…
Citation impact
- FWCI
- 67.38
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 88
Authors
13- BABalázs AczélCorresponding
Eötvös Loránd University, Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Psychology
- ABAnn‐Sophie Barwich
Indiana University Bloomington, Indiana University
- ABAmanda B. Diekman
Indiana University Bloomington, Indiana University
- AFAyelet Fishbach
University of Chicago
- RLRobert L. Goldstone
Indiana University Bloomington, Indiana University
Topics & keywords
- Dialog box
- Peer review
- Perspective (graphical)
- Psychological intervention
- Peer-to-peer
- Technical peer review
- Point (geometry)
- Engineering ethics