reviewStrokeJan 30, 2025Closed access

Thrombolysis for Ischemic Stroke Beyond the 4.5-Hour Window: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials

Oldham Council · Lenox Hill Hospital · +19 more institutions

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Background

A minority of patients with stroke qualify for intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) within 4.5-hour window. The safety and efficacy of IVT beyond this period have not been well studied.

Methods

We systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, and ClinicalTrials.gov for relevant randomized clinical trials. Randomized clinical trials comparing IVT versus standard medical care in patients with ischemic stroke beyond 4.5 hours of symptom onset or last known well without mechanical thrombectomy (MT) were included. Primary outcomes were excellent (modified Rankin Scale score of 0–1) and good (modified Rankin Scale score of 0–2) functional outcomes at 90 days, symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH), and death at 90 days. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs were calculated using a random-effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed by Q test and quantified by I ² values.

Citation impact

49
total citations
FWCI
51.78
Percentile
100%
References
26
Citations per year

Authors

16

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Medicine
  • Modified Rankin Scale
  • Randomized controlled trial
  • Thrombolysis
  • Odds ratio
  • Stroke (engine)
  • Internal medicine
  • Meta-analysis
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Good health and well-being
No related works found for this paper.