A Comparative Analysis of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods and Normalization Techniques in Holistic Sustainability Assessment for Engineering Applications
Indexed incrossrefdoaj
Abstract
The sustainability evaluation of engineering processes and structures is a multifaceted challenge requiring the integration of diverse and often conflicting criteria. To address this challenge, Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) methods have emerged as effective tools. However, the selection of the most suitable MCDM approach for problems involving multiple criteria is critical to ensuring robust, reliable, and actionable outcomes. Equally significant is the choice of a proper normalization technique, which plays a pivotal role in determining the robustness and reliability of the results. This study investigates the impact of common MCDM tools on the decision-making process concerning diverse aspects of…
Citation impact
43
total citations
- FWCI
- 33.87
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 52
Citations per year
Authors
4Topics & keywords
Topics
Keywords
- Normalization (sociology)
- Sustainability
- Management science
- Computer science
- Engineering
- Biology
- Sociology
- Ecology
No related works found for this paper.