Local anaesthetic transperineal biopsy versus transrectal prostate biopsy in prostate cancer detection (TRANSLATE): a multicentre, randomised, controlled trial
Churchill Hospital · Oxford BioMedica (United Kingdom) · +19 more institutions
Abstract
Prostate cancer diagnosis requires biopsy, traditionally performed under local anaesthetic with ultrasound guidance via a transrectal approach (TRUS). Local anaesthetic ultrasound-guided transperineal biopsy (LATP) is gaining popularity in this setting; however, there is uncertainty regarding prostate sampling, infection rates, tolerability, side-effects, and cost-effectiveness. TRANSLATE was a randomised clinical trial that aimed to compare detection of Gleason Grade Group (GGG) 2 or higher prostate cancer, side-effects, tolerability, and patient-reported outcomes, after LATP versus TRUS biopsy.
In this randomised clinical trial which was done at ten hospitals in the UK, patients aged 18 years or older were eligible if investigated for suspected prostate cancer based on elevated age-specific prostate-specific antigen or abnormal digital rectal examination, and if biopsy-naive having received pre-biopsy MRI on a 1·5 or higher Tesla scanner. Individuals were excluded if they had any previous prostate biopsy, extensive local disease easily detectable by any biopsy (prostate-specific antigen >50 ng/mL or entire gland replaced by tumour on MRI), symptoms of concurrent or recent urinary tract infection, history of immunocompromise, need for enhanced antibiotic prophylaxis, absent rectum, or inability to position in lithotomy. Participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive LATP or TRUS biopsy, using web-based software with a randomisation sequence using a minimisation algorithm to ensure balanced allocation across biopsy groups for minimisation factors (recruitment site, and location of the MRI lesion). The primary outcome was detection of GGG 2 or higher prostate cancer, analysed in the modified intention-to-treat population (all randomly assigned to treatment who had a biopsy result available). Key secondary endpoints assessing post-biopsy adverse events were infection, bleeding, urinary and sexual function, tolerability, and patient-reported outcomes. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05179694) and at ISRCTN (ISRCTN98159689), and is complete.
Citation impact
- FWCI
- 76.12
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 31
Authors
151- RJRichard J. BryantCorresponding
Churchill Hospital, Oxford BioMedica (United Kingdom), Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust
- IRIoana R. Marian
Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, University of Oxford
- RWR. Williams
University of Oxford
- JFJosé Francisco Juárez López
Churchill Hospital, University of Oxford
- CMClàudia Mercader
Churchill Hospital, University of Oxford
Topics & keywords
- Medicine
- Prostate cancer
- Biopsy
- Urology
- Prostate biopsy
- Prostate
- Randomized controlled trial
- Cancer
- Good health and well-being
Funding
- PPfizer
- GSGilead Sciences
- POPatient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
- HMHamad Medical Corporation
- BSBoston Scientific Corporation
- BCBladder Cancer Advocacy Network
- ISIntuitive Surgical
- UPUroGen Pharma
- CRCancer Research UK
- NINational Institute for Health and Care Research
- UOUniversity of Oxford
- PCProstate Cancer UK
- APAstellas Pharma
- NNeuroförbundet
- KÜKoç Üniversitesi
- JBJohn Black Charitable Foundation
- HTHealth Technology Assessment ProgrammeAward: NIHR131233
- NONIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre
- EEurostars