Evaluating Bibliometrics Reviews: A Practical Guide for Peer Review and Critical Reading
Indexed incrossrefpubmed
Abstract
Along with discussing bibliometric analyses' limitations and potential biases, this paper addresses the growing need for comprehensive guidelines in evaluating bibliometric research by providing systematic frameworks for both peer reviewers and readers. While numerous publications provide guidance on implementing bibliometric methods, there is a notable lack of frameworks for assessing such research, particularly regarding performance analysis and science mapping. Drawing from an extensive review of bibliometric practices and methodological literature, this paper develops structured evaluation frameworks that address the complexity of modern bibliometric analysis, introducing the VALOR framework (Verification,…
Citation impact
44
total citations
- FWCI
- 45.31
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 74
Citations per year
Authors
1Topics & keywords
Keywords
- Bibliometrics
- Computer science
- Data science
- Management science
- Field (mathematics)
- Conceptual framework
- Sociology
- Data mining
UN Sustainable Development Goals
- Quality Education
No related works found for this paper.