Long-term trials of colchicine for secondary prevention of vascular events: a meta-analysis
Dalhousie University · University Medical Center Groningen · +19 more institutions
Abstract
Randomized controlled trials comparing the incidence of cardiovascular events between patients with clinically manifest vascular disease randomized to colchicine vs. placebo and ≥12-month follow-up were included. The primary efficacy endpoint is major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and includes cardiovascular mortality, MI, ischaemic stroke, and urgent coronary revascularization. The DerSimonian and Laird random effects model was used to calculate pooled effect estimates.
Six RCTs, with a pooled sample size of 21 800 patients, were included (colchicine n = 10 871; placebo n = 10 929). Over a follow-up of 12-34 months, colchicine reduced the incidence of MACE compared with placebo [pooled hazard ratio .75, 95% confidence interval (CI) .56-.93]. The reduction in cardiovascular events among colchicine patients was driven by reductions in MIs, ischaemic strokes, and urgent coronary revascularizations (P .05 for all), including non-cardiovascular deaths (risk ratio 1.08, 95% CI .76-1.54).
Citation impact
- FWCI
- 31.90
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 27
Authors
9- MSMichelle SamuelCorresponding
Dalhousie University, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen
- CBColin Berry
Golden Jubilee National Hospital, University of Glasgow
- MDMarie‐Pierre Dubé
Montreal Heart Institute, Université de Montréal
- WKWolfgang Köenig
Universität Ulm, Zimmer Biomet (United States), German Centre for Cardiovascular Research, Deutsches Herzzentrum München, Technical University of Munich
- JLJosé López‐Sendón
Hospital La Paz Institute for Health Research, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
Topics & keywords
- Medicine
- Colchicine
- Term (time)
- Meta-analysis
- Secondary prevention
- Intensive care medicine
- Internal medicine
- Good health and well-being