Longer scans boost prediction and cut costs in brain-wide association studies
National University of Singapore · National University Health System · +27 more institutions
Abstract
Abstract A pervasive dilemma in brain-wide association studies 1 (BWAS) is whether to prioritize functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) scan time or sample size. We derive a theoretical model showing that individual-level phenotypic prediction accuracy increases with sample size and total scan duration (sample size × scan time per participant). The model explains empirical prediction accuracies well across 76 phenotypes from nine resting-fMRI and task-fMRI datasets ( R 2 = 0.89), spanning diverse scanners, acquisitions, racial groups, disorders and ages. For scans of ≤20 min, accuracy increases linearly with the logarithm of the total scan duration, suggesting that sample size and scan time are initially…
Citation impact
- FWCI
- 50.53
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 89
Authors
30- LQLeon Qi Rong OoiCorresponding
National University of Singapore, National University Health System, Clinical Nutrition Research Centre
- COCsaba Orbán
National University of Singapore, National University Health System, Clinical Nutrition Research Centre
- SZShaoshi Zhang
National University of Singapore, National University Health System, Clinical Nutrition Research Centre
- TEThomas E. Nichols
University of Oxford, Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging
- TWTrevor Wei Kiat Tan
National University of Singapore, National University Health System, Clinical Nutrition Research Centre
Topics & keywords
- Sample size determination
- Computer science
- Neuroimaging
- Sample (material)
- Logarithm
- Functional magnetic resonance imaging
- Contrast (vision)
- Magnetic resonance imaging
Funding
- FFFoundation for the National Institutes of HealthAwards: U24DA041123, U19AG024904, 1U54MH091657
- AAAlzheimer's Association
- ELEli Lilly and Company
- PPfizer
- BBiogen
- FHF. Hoffmann-La Roche
- MSMeso Scale Diagnostics
- ADAlzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging InitiativeAward: U19AG024904
- BBioClinica
- NCNorthern California Institute for Research and Education
- HCHope Center for Neurological Disorders
- EEisai
- SServier
- HLH. Lundbeck A/S
- IIXICO
- TFTemasek FoundationAward: TF2223-IMH-01
- NINational Institutes of HealthAwards: U01DA050987, U24DA041147, 1U54MH091657, U01DA041120, U24DA041123, U01DA050989, U01DA050988, U01DA051039, U01DA041089, U01DA041022, U19AG024904, MH121518, U01DA041156, U01DA041174, -0001, U01DA051037, U01DA051018, U01DA041048, MH121276, U01DA041093, U01DA041117, U01DA051016, MH096773, U01DA041148, U01DA041106, U01DA041025, U01DA041134, U01DA051038, MH122066, MH124567, U01DA041028
- GGenentech
- IAIntellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Center
- MCMcDonnell Center for Systems NeuroscienceAward: 1U54MH091657
- CICanadian Institutes of Health ResearchAwards: U01DA041089, U01DA041148, U01DA041117, U01DA051016, U01DA041120, U01DA051018, U01DA041156, U01DA051038, U01DA041106, U01DA041022, U01DA050988, U01DA041093, U01DA041134, U24DA041123, U01DA051037, U01DA041048, U01DA041028, U01DA041174, U01DA050989, U01DA051039, U01DA050987, U01DA041025, U24DA041147
- MRMedical Research CouncilAward: 1U54MH091657
- NMNational Medical Research CouncilAwards: STaR20nov-0003, OFIRG24jul-0049, CTGIIT23jan-0001, OFIRG24jan-0006, CG21APR1009
- NINational Institute of Mental HealthAwards: U01DA041134, U01DA051018, U01DA051038, MH129616, U01DA050987, U01DA050988, MH124567, MH121518, U01DA051016, MH122066, NS129521, U01DA041089, U01DA041048, U01DA041148, U01DA041022, U01DA041093, U01DA041106, U01DA041156, U01DA041025, U01DA051039, 1U54MH091657, U01DA041174, MH096773, U01DA041117, U24DA041147, MH121276, U24DA041123, U01DA050989, U01DA041120, U01DA051037, U01DA041028