articlePubMedJan 1, 2006GREEN OA

Evaluation of PICO as a knowledge representation for clinical questions.

University of Maryland, College Park

PubMed
Indexed inpubmed

Abstract

The paradigm of evidence-based medicine (EBM) recommends that physicians formulate clinical questions in terms of the problem/population, intervention, comparison, and outcome. Together, these elements comprise a PICO frame. Although this framework was developed to facilitate the formulation of clinical queries, the ability of PICO structures to represent physicians' information needs has not been empirically investigated. This paper evaluates the adequacy and suitability of PICO frames as a knowledge representation by analyzing 59 real-world primary-care clinical questions. We discovered that only two questions in our corpus contain all four PICO elements, and that 37% of questions contain both intervention…

Citation impact

842
total citations
FWCI
3.31
Percentile
100%
References
18
Citations per year

Authors

3

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Intervention (counseling)
  • Representation (politics)
  • Outcome (game theory)
  • Point (geometry)
  • Computer science
  • Frame (networking)
  • Medicine
  • Medical education
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Quality Education
No related works found for this paper.