Opioid‐free vs. opioid‐inclusive anaesthesia with or without regional anaesthesia for postoperative pain: a systematic review with network meta‐analysis of randomised controlled trials
Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust · Universidade Federal de Campina Grande · +6 more institutions
Abstract
Concerns about opioid-related adverse effects have increased interest in opioid-free anaesthesia, but the benefits compared with opioid-inclusive techniques, especially in the presence of regional anaesthesia, remain uncertain.
We undertook a systematic review with a network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials comparing six strategies in adults: opioid-free anaesthesia and opioid-inclusive anaesthesia using remifentanil alone or other opioids, each with or without regional anaesthesia. Primary outcome was postoperative pain. Secondary outcomes were: postoperative opioid use; post-anaesthesia care unit discharge time; hospital duration of stay; and incidence of complications.
Citation impact
- FWCI
- 117.22
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 27
Authors
12- CLC. L. de CarvalhoCorresponding
Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Universidade Federal de Campina Grande, Surgical Specialties (United States), Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
- KEKariem El‐Boghdadly
King's College London, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust
- IHIdrys H. L. Guedes
Universidade Federal de Campina Grande
- MVMaria Vitória M. Dantas
Universidade Federal de Campina Grande
- DPDanusa P. B. Tomé
Universidade Federal de Campina Grande
Topics & keywords
- Regional anaesthesia
- Regional anesthesia
- Analgesic
- Nausea
- General anaesthesia
- Postoperative pain
- Randomized controlled trial