Trial Design and Objectives for Patients With Prostate Cancer: Recommendations From the Prostate Cancer Working Group 4
Duke University · Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · +45 more institutions
Abstract
We convened an international expert committee of diverse working groups, the Prostate Cancer Working Group 4 (PCWG4), between 2016 and 2025. Our objective was to formulate updated criteria based on emerging evidence and clinical trial data in a biomarker context to provide guidance for clinical trial design, eligibility, and end point assessments for patients with advanced prostate cancer.
PCWG4 redefines terminology around the disease state and previous therapies in a patient-centric context and terminology focused on androgen pathway modulation. We consider imaging, with a particular focus on positron emission tomography (PET)-defined disease. New recommendations are provided for disease state terminology, defining eligibility criteria, response and delay/prevent end points, intervals for reassessments including imaging, and patient-reported outcome determination. We provide recommendations in a biomarker-based context of use for the intended indication, reflective of patient benefit for specific interventions. We emphasize the need for development of validated PET imaging and molecular and phenotypic criteria as well as trial designs to appropriately risk stratify patients, predict and assess benefit, and measure post-treatment outcomes reliably in a trial framework.
Citation impact
- FWCI
- 78.50
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 56
Authors
69- AJAndrew J. ArmstrongCorresponding
Duke University
- MMM. Morris
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
- WAWassim Abida
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
- RRRahul R. Aggarwal
University of California, San Francisco, UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center
- ESEmmanuel S. Antonarakis
University of Minnesota
Topics & keywords
- Prostate cancer
- Prostate
- Population
- Androgen
- Disease
- Androgen deprivation therapy
- Clinical trial