articleNew England Journal of MedicineMar 28, 2026Closed access

Left Atrial Appendage Closure or Anticoagulation for Atrial Fibrillation

Pacific Heart Institute · Cedars-Sinai Smidt Heart Institute · +33 more institutions

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Background

For patients with atrial fibrillation, the use of oral anticoagulant therapy to prevent stroke is limited by the risk of bleeding. Left atrial appendage closure is considered for patients who are unsuitable candidates for long-term anticoagulation, but its role in patients who are eligible for anticoagulants has not been established.

Methods

In this ongoing, prospective, international, randomized trial involving patients with atrial fibrillation who were suitable candidates for anticoagulation, we randomly assigned patients in a 1:1 ratio to receive either device-based left atrial appendage closure (device group) or non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC) therapy (anticoagulation group). The primary efficacy end point - a composite of death from cardiovascular causes, stroke, or systemic embolism - was tested for noninferiority (noninferiority margin, 4.8 percentage points) after 3 years of follow-up. The primary safety end point, non-procedure-related bleeding, was tested for superiority.

Citation impact

7
total citations
FWCI
120.65
Percentile
100%
References
24
Too recent for citation history.

Authors

34

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Atrial fibrillation
  • Closure (psychology)
  • Appendage
  • Atrial Appendage
  • Left atrial appendage occlusion
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Zero hunger
No related works found for this paper.