Rear-View Epistemology and the Paradox of Evolutionary Endpoints
Indexed indatacite
Abstract
This paper demonstrates that any single-layer deterministic ontology — most prominently the 4D block-universe model — generates an epistemological self-refutation when applied to evolutionary processes. Human scientific knowledge is necessarily retrospective: it is constructed exclusively from realized (past) nodes within a stratified architecture. While this “rear-view mirror” methodology is reliable for repetitional nodes (closed-loop, low-novelty patterns), it is structurally insufficient for evolutionary nodes (open-system, cumulative informational novelty). Attempting to declare that evolutionary endpoints “have already happened” in a static block therefore constitutes a categorical error. The argument…
Citation impact
4
total citations
- FWCI
- 180.19
- Percentile
- 99%
- References
- 0
Too recent for citation history.
Authors
1Topics & keywords
Topics
Keywords
- Categorical variable
- Argument (complex analysis)
- Contradiction
- Evolutionary theory
- Ontology
- Completeness (order theory)
- Law of excluded middle
- Evolutionary algorithm
No related works found for this paper.