Engineering Design Thinking, Teaching, and Learning
John Wiley & Sons (United States) · Harvey Mudd College · +4 more institutions
Abstract
This paper is based on the premises that the purpose of engineering education is to graduate engineers who can design, and that design thinking is complex. The paper begins by briefly reviewing the history and role of design in the engineering curriculum. Several dimensions of design thinking are then detailed, explaining why design is hard to learn and harder still to teach, and outlining the research available on how well design thinking skills are learned. The currently most-favored pedagogical model for teaching design, project-based learning (PBL), is explored next, along with available assessment data on its success. Two contexts for PBL are emphasized: first-year cornerstone courses and globally…
Citation impact
- FWCI
- 97.83
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 133
Authors
5- CLClive L. DymCorresponding
John Wiley & Sons (United States), Harvey Mudd College, Cambridge University Press
- AMAlice M. AgoginoCorresponding
University of New Mexico, University of California, Berkeley
- ÖEÖzgür ErişCorresponding
- DFDaniel FreyCorresponding
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
- LLLarry LeiferCorresponding
Topics & keywords
- Cornerstone
- Curriculum
- Design thinking
- Engineering education
- Engineering design process
- Mathematics education
- Learning design
- Critical thinking